The presentation covered some of these points which I thought were of particular importance.
- 97% of all 3 and 4 year olds in Scotland take up the free provision paid for by the Scottish Executive.
- Research (except the most recent from Durham University) gives very clear indication of the benefits of good early years education in preparing children for the next stage.
- There is continuing improvement in the qualifications of staff in the early years sector leading to increased engagement with the self evaluation process.
- There needs to be more work done in relation to transition. This is not just an issue for early years to primary school but within each stage of progression. QI 5.1 looks at this theme in particular.
- Self evaluation does not exist in a vacuum. It is there in order to improve outcomes for children. Action must follow self evaluation.
- There will still need to be links across ftrom CATC to the national care standards implemented by the Care Commission.
- The overall framework of CATC and HGIOS is based on the EQFM.
- CATC now has illustrations at level 5 and level 2 as well as examples of sources of evidence for each indicator.
- Each QI cannot be seen in isolation. Instead it is noted that QIS from one section have dependencies with others. Outcome and impact is dependent on the processes within the establishment which are dependent on high quality leadership.
- With the focus on active learning in the early years of primary, it is anticipated that primary schools will use CATC in order to evaluate the quality of provision in this stages. This will involve head teachers working across both CATC and HGIOS. This will provide both opportunity and challenge.
The next steps involve considering how we can raise this level of awareness beyond the QIO team to head teachers of early years centres and primary schools.










